The following was extracted from: Doctors for Integrity in Research & Public Policy Edgar A. Suter, MD, Chair 5201 Norris Canyon Road Suite 140 San Ramon, CA 94583 ------------------------------START QUOTE-------------------------------- THE "43 TIMES" FALLACY We have all head that "a gunowner is 43 times more likely to kill a family member than intruder." How did this fallacy start? In a 1985 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, Drs. Kellerman and Reay described the proper way to calculate how many people are saved by guns compared to how many are hurt by guns. The benefits should include, in the authors' own words, "cases in which burglars or intrud- ers are wounded or frightened away by the use or display of a firearm [and] cases in which would-be intruders may have purposely avoided a house known to be armed..." However, when Kellerman and Reay calculated their compari- son, they did NOT include those cases, they only counted the times a homeowner KILLED the criminal. Because only 0.1% (1 in a 1,000) of defensive gun usage involves the death of the criminal, KELLERMAN AND REAY UNDERSTATED THE PROTECTIVE BENEFITS OF FIREARMS BY A FACTOR OF 1,000! They turned the truth on its head! Why? Kellerman emotionally confessed his anti-gun prejudice at the 1993 HELP Conference. Honest analysis, even by Kellerman and Reay's own standards, shows the "43 times" comparison to be superficially appeal- ing, but actually a deceitful contrivance - unfortunately, a lie that is parroted by the well-funded gun-prohibition lobby and by gullible and biased journalists. -------------------------------END QUOTE-------------------------------- And this came from: Downloaded from GUN-TALK (703-934-2121) A service of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action Fairfax, VA 22030 ------------------------------START QUOTE-------------------------------- Anti-gunners cite "studies" they claim show that firearms kept at home are "43 times more likely" to be used to kill family members than be used for self-defense. (Other "studies" claim different ratios.) The 43:1 claim, based upon a small-scale study of Kings County (Seattle) and Shelby County (Memphis), is a fraud, because it counts as self-defense gun uses only those cases in which criminals were killed in the defender's home. Approximately 99.9% of all defensive gun uses are not fatal shootings, however -- criminals are usually frightened off, held at bay, or non-fatally wounded. Also, many defensive firearms uses occur away from home. Further, suicides were counted as "family member killings" in the "study," elevating that number more than 500%. Unfortunately, some of these "studies" are funded with taxpayer dollars, through grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a division of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Downloaded from GUN-TALK (703-934-2121) A service of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action Fairfax, VA 22030 -------------------------------END QUOTE-------------------------------- ÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜ ÛÜÜ Û ÜÜÛaboty Ûalon --- GEcho 1.00 * Origin: Freelance Inc - Fayetteville/Ft Bragg (867-8184) (176:400/13.1) 0SEEN-BY: 400/0 13 15 19 0PATH: 400/13